2009 Elections Prove Israel Ripe for Belief-Based Leadership

Playing on the theory that Israel is not yet ready for a belief-based leader, Moshe Feiglin's opponents claimed that his election in the 2009 Likud primaries would mean that the Likud would lose 6 mandates; ostensibly of those people who would not identify with belief-based leadership. But when Feiglin was elected to the 20th place on the Likud roster, just the opposite occurred. The Likud immediately began to gain in the polls, reaching 36 projected mandates. After Moshe Feiglin was forced down to 36th place on the Likud roster, the Likud's standing in the polls began to decline.

The following graph clearly shows the patterns that led to the Likud's slow but steady decline over the election campaign.

                 Conclusions:
A. There is complete symmetry between the decline of the Likud and                  the rise of Lieberman's party, and later of the National Union.

B. The Likud's decline begins when it loses its rightist/nationalist                  hue as a result of Netanyahu's battle against Feiglin.

C. From the beginning of December and until the elections, Lieberman                  and the National Union gained 11 mandates at the Likud's expense.                  The Likud with Moshe Feiglin could have won at least 38 mandates in these elections.

                 D. Israel voted Right because it is thirsting for                  leadership based on Jewish values and ethics.